Palabras clave
Aprendizaje Dialógico
Interacciones Dialógicas
Discapacidad Intelectual
Educación Inclusiva
Inclusión Social
Jóvenes
Cómo citar
Resumen
La autodeterminación está relacionada con la toma de decisiones consciente e intencionada. Aunque diversas teorías destacan la naturaleza interactiva y relativa de la autodeterminación en personas con discapacidad intelectual, los estudios empíricos tienden a seguir enfoques individualistas centrados en el desarrollo de sus habilidades. El presente trabajo propone una perspectiva dialógica para explorar y promover la autodeterminación, sus aspectos más relevantes para los jóvenes con discapacidad intelectual y cómo podría coconstruirse en los diálogos que entablan con otras personas. Para ello, se siguió un diseño flexible de corte etnográfico, en el cual participaron, con sus observaciones, 10 jóvenes con discapacidad intelectual y tres facilitadores de un programa de transición a la vida adulta, en grupos de discusión. A partir de un estudio temático y un análisis sociocultural del discurso, los resultados indicaron aspectos que los jóvenes identifican como relevantes en su toma de decisiones, así como formas en las que la autodeterminación puede promoverse u obstaculizarse en el diálogo.
Citas
Abery, B., & Stancliffe, R. (1996). The ecology of self-determination. En D. Sands, & M. Wehmeyer, Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choise for people with disabilities, pp. 111-145. Paul H. Brookes.
Abery, B., & Stancliffe, R. (2003). An ecological theory of self-determination: theoretical foundations. En M. Wehmeyer, B. Abery, D. Mithaug, & R. Stancliffe (Eds.), Theory in self-determination: foundations for educational practice, pp. 25-42. Springfield, Charles C Thomas.
Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). Cambridge: Dialogos.
Algozzine, B., Browder, D., Karvonen, M., Test, D., & Wood, W. (2001). Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), pp. 219-277. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3516085
Bajtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. University of Texas Press.
Bajtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Manchester University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77-101. https://doi.org10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Burke, K., Raley, S., Shogren, K., Hagiwara, M., Mumbardó-Adam, C., Uyanik, H., & Behrens, S. (2018). A meta-analysis of interventions to promote self-determination for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 41(3), pp. 176-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518802274
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum.
Hennessy, S., Rojas-Drummond, S., Higham, R., Márquez, A., Maine, F., Ríos, R., Barrera, M. (2016). Developing a coding scheme for analysing classroom dialogue across educational contexts. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 9, pp. 16-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.12.001
Jones, M. (2006). Teaching self-determination: Empowered teachers, empowered students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(1), pp. 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990603900102
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. Routledge.
Mercer, N. (2005). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), pp. 137-168. http://thinkingtogether.educ.cam.ac.uk/publications/journals/Mercer_JCL2005.pdf
Mercer, N. (2010). The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X479853
Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A socio-cultural approach. Routledge.
Rubio-Jiménez, A. (2021). Exploring and developing the self-determination of Mexican young adults with intellectual disability following a dialogic approach (Tesis doctoral, Cambridge, University). https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.82551
Rubio-Jiménez, A., & Kershner, R. (2020). Promoting the self-determination of Mexican young adults identified with intellectual disability: A sociocultural discourse analysis of their discussion about goal setting. Social Sciences, 9(11), p. 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9110200
Saad, E., Zacarías, J., & Buenfil, C. (2017). ‘Construyendo Puentes’: Modelo de inclusión educativa para jóvenes con discapacidad intelectual: alcances y desafíos. En XIV Congreso Nacional de Investigación Educativa. San Luis Potosí, México. https://www.comie.org.mx/congreso/memoriaelectronica/v14/doc/1290.pdf
Schalock, R., Luckasson, R., Shogren, K., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Bradley, V., Buntinx, & W., Yeager, M. (2007). The renaming of mental retardation: understanding the change to the term intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 45(2), pp. 116-124. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556(2007)45[116:TROMRU]2.0.CO;2
Shogren, K. (2018). Strengths-based approaches: Positive psychology and disability. En K. Shogren, M. Wehmeyer, J. Martinis, & P. Blanck (Eds.), Supported decision-making: Theory, research, and practice to enhance self-determination and quality of life, pp. 46-67. Cambridge University Press.
Shogren, K., Luckasson, R., & Schalock, R. (2014). The definition of “context” and its application in the field of intellectual disability. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 11(2), pp. 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12077
Shogren, K., Wehmeyer, M., Palmer, S., Forber-Pratt, A., Little, T., & Lopez, S. (2015). Causal agency theory: Reconceptualizing a functional model of self-determination. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(3), pp. 251-263. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24827508
Skidmore, D. (2017). Dialogism and education. En D. Skidmore, & K. Murakami (Eds.), Dialogic pedagogy: The importance of dialogue in teaching and learning, pp. 17-47. Multilingual Matters.
Thompson, J., & Viriyangkura, Y. (2013). Supports and support needs. En M. Wehmeyer (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability, pp. 317-337. Oxford University Press.
Wegerif, R. (2011). Towards a dialogic theory of how children learn to think. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(3), pp. 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2011.08.002
Wegerif, R. (2019). Dialogic Education. En Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.396
Wegerif, R., & Major L., Towards a dialogic theory of education for the Internet age. En N. Mercer (Ed), The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic
Education, pp. 14-26.
Wehmeyer, M. (2005). Self-determination and individuals with severe disabilities: Re-examining meanings and misinterpretations. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30(3), pp. 113-120. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.30.3.113
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2023 DIDAC